Why Bans of Low-Risk Nicotine Alternatives to Smoking in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) Will Do More Harm Than Good

In 2020, The International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), a Bloomberg partner for ‘The Initiative to reduce tobacco use’, published its fourth position statement on e-cigarettes. In it, The Union called for a blanket ban on all electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and heated tobacco products (HTPs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

INNCO has developed a report in response to The Union, titled 10 reasons why blanket bans of e-cigarettes and HTPs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are not fit for purpose.

Smoking prevalence remains high, with around 1.3 billion people who smoke and/or use high-risk forms of tobacco. More than 80% of those people live in LMICs. 

Our sincere desire is to spark conversation about the right to reduce harm as a human rights issue and to highlight the inherent injustice associated with denying people access to safer alternatives simply because of where they live.

INNCO Slide Deck Presentation

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download

Download Presentation

Why Bans of Low-Risk Nicotine Alternatives to Smoking in LMICs Will Do More Harm Than Good

Recommended Viewing

An Overview of Tobacco Harm Reduction by Clive Bates
Why Bans in LMICs Don’t Work- Latin America (Part 1)
Why Bans in LMICs Don’t Work – Africa
Why Bans in LMICs Don’t Work – Latin America (Part 2)
Why Bans in LMICs Don’t Work – India
Why Bans in LMICs Don’t Work – Women & Tobacco

Shareable Images